It’s not all about productivity

Over my years as a business journalist, I’ve received countless studies sounding alarm bells about an alleged productivity gap between Canada and the United States. Invariably, these studies are funded by technology companies, and invariably, one of the solutions to solving this frightful productivity gap is, predictably, spend more on technology.

I’ve certainly covered many of these reports. I remember one vendor would always present “new” research on the productivity gap at its annual user conference. I joked to a colleague one year I should just change the dates on last year’s coverage, as the refrain sounded the same. Productivity gap bad, spend more money with us!

I’ve always found this argument, besides being self-serving, to be empty and deliberately narrow. Even if we accept this productivity gap is a thing, and that it’s a bad thing, it is but one measure of economic competitiveness. On corporate taxes, for instance, Canada compares favourably to the U.S. And one measure often overlooked is health care. Employee health care is a major expense for a U.S.-based business that wants to attract talent; in Canada, our public system lessens this cost considerably, making it cheaper to do business here.

I’ve always found productivity an overrated economic indicator, but don’t just take my word for it. Now there’s actual research to back that argument up. According to a media report, a soon to be published report in the International Productivity Monitor by top economists from the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and the International Monetary Fund argues that labour supply is more important to economic growth that productivity.

The report argues that an abundant labour supply has allowed Canada to expand its economy over the years despite weak productivity gains, and that frightful productivity gap. Rather than solely focus on productivity, which governments (and the technology community) have done inordinately for years, the economists recommend ensuring an ample labour supply through skills training support and immigration policy.

Now, no one is saying productivity isn’t important. But it should not be the only area of focus, and the impact of productivity improvements on real economic growth is limited. We need a balanced approach including productivity gains, a skilled labour pool, tax policy and investment in research and development.

And I think I’d be more productive if I hear less about our productivity gap.

Would you recommend this article?


Thanks for taking the time to let us know what you think of this article!
We'd love to hear your opinion about this or any other story you read in our publication.

Jim Love, Chief Content Officer, IT World Canada

Featured Download

Jeff Jedras
Jeff Jedras
A veteran technology and business journalist, Jeff Jedras began his career in technology journalism in the late 1990s, covering the booming (and later busting) Ottawa technology sector for Silicon Valley North and the Ottawa Business Journal, as well as everything from municipal politics to real estate. He later covered the technology scene in Vancouver before joining IT World Canada in Toronto in 2005, covering enterprise IT for ComputerWorld Canada. He would go on to cover the channel as an assistant editor with CDN. His writing has appeared in the Vancouver Sun, the Ottawa Citizen and a wide range of industry trade publications.

Related Tech News

Featured Tech Jobs


CDN in your inbox

CDN delivers a critical analysis of the competitive landscape detailing both the challenges and opportunities facing solution providers. CDN's email newsletter details the most important news and commentary from the channel.