SAP wants a judge to reduce the US$1.3 billion award a jury granted Oracle last year in its intellectual property-theft lawsuit to no more than US$408.7 million, and also asked for a new trial, according to filings made late Wednesday in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Oracle sued SAP in 2007, alleging that its former subsidiary, TomorrowNow, illegally downloaded Oracle software and support materials in the course of providing lower-cost support to Oracle customers.
SAP accepted liability for TomorrowNow’s actions but considered the award’s size to be unfair. The motion filed Wednesday argues, as SAP has previously, that Oracle should not have been given damages for “hypothetical” software license fees it would have gained from SAP if it had purchased them legally.
“A hypothetical license is available only if a plaintiff proves that, but for the infringement, the parties would have agreed to such a license or that it would have licensed a third party for the same use and was prevented from doing so by the infringement,” SAP’s motion states.
Oracle and SAP are “fierce competitors” in enterprise applications,” it adds. “The trial evidence conclusively demonstrated that Oracle never would have obtained license fees absent Defendants’ infringement — not under any condition, not in any amount, and not from any party.”
The jury’s award was “grossly excessive,” “shocks the conscience,” clashes with copyright law and led to a “miscarriage of justice,” the motion states.
Using a “reality-based” approach, an expert SAP hired determined that Oracle’s damages should be about US$28 million. Oracle’s own expert placed damages at US$408.7 million. “In no event” should Oracle be awarded anything higher than that figure, SAP argued.
The court should order a new trial if Oracle declines a reduced award, SAP said.
A hearing on the motion is scheduled for July 13.
Oracle spokeswoman Deborah Hellinger declined comment.
